6348.jpg

Australia news live: Liberals weighing up Bradfield legal challenge; 68-year-old man dies in police custody in Darwin | Australia news


Coalition still pondering legal challenge over Bradfield defeat

With the count in the seat of Bradfield finalised, where the difference in the result came down to 26 votes, Paterson says he can’t confirm whether the Coalition will seek to challenge the result.

I understand that the New South Wales Liberal party is reviewing our legal options, and I really hope that we can find a way to have Gisele Kapterian in the parliament, because she’s exactly the type of person to make the Liberal party better and the parliament better. She has great insights and professional experience. She’s a person that I hope to be playing a big role in the future of the party. But it is up to the New South Wales division and ultimately, if we decide to make any application in the court of disputed returns to that.

Asked about comments from Kapterian that the 2025 election result showed that “the position on net zero has been put to bed”, Paterson says the party’s position on the issue will be considered as part of the ongoing review.

The Liberal candidate for Bradfield, Gisele Kapterian, lost the recount by 26 voteas.
The Liberal candidate for Bradfield, Gisele Kapterian, lost the recount by 26 voteas. Photograph: Dan Himbrechts/AAP

He also demurred on whether the party could find a byelection in the seat without a stated position on the future of climate change and net zero.

I’m not going to publicly engage on debate about internal policy about that. I have the opportunity to do so through the shadow cabinet process. But if there is a byelection, I would back Gisele because she’s an outstanding candidate and outstanding Liberal and someone who is placed to make a big contribution to the future of our country inside one of the major parties that will ultimately form government in this country.

That’s not something that an independent can do. And if the independents were relatively inconsequential in the last parliament, they’ll be even less relevant in this one.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Josh Butler

Josh Butler

Tim Wilson says work from home arrangements should be negotiated between workers and employers, shrugging off what he called a “heavy solution” outlined by the Coalition at the May election to end work from home for public sector employees.

The controversial policy, which was dumped mid-campaign in an embarrassing Peter Dutton backflip, has been blamed as a major factor in turning off professional women and young people from voting Liberal. The Coalition has indicated work from home arrangements shouldn’t be discouraged like this. Wilson, the new shadow minister for industrial relations, told Sky News that workers should “have a sense of ownership and responsibility of their workplace arrangements, in partnership with their employers.”

So if employers can find a pathway where, and employees can find a pathway, together in partnership for working from home because it works in their best interest, then that would always be the baseline at which I’d approach workplace arrangements. It’s not for me to dictate what those terms are.

When it comes to the politics of it, I think a lot of people looked at it and… it was probably interpreted, anyway, as a heavy solution to what should be, for the most part, a productivity managed problem between employers and employees.

Wilson said the WFH policy was raised with him “from time to time” while campaigning for Goldstein, but that equally he had employers who felt they “no longer had a balanced relationship with their employees and wanted redress”. Wilson said the issue should be looked at from a productivity standpoint, about what works best for the business and employees.

We do know that happy workers tend to be more productive, and there’s certainly circumstances where people working from home can be more productive than they might otherwise be.

Because of commute times, because of their capacity to balance out their work and family lives, based on what their needs are, but it can vary circumstance to circumstance.



Source link